View Single Post
Old 06-19-2007, 09:10 AM   #15 (permalink)
AUTHORITY 1
VM Member

Posts: 762
Join Date: Jul 2004

Ride: 1989 HONDA CRX SI

Fav Mod:

Class:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Kael View Post
Did you miss my whole post? Nissan has made variations of cars for a long time. Look at the Bluebird/Avenir/Pulsar. I'm sure they were all competing with each other, yet they all did moderately well. So why not make it sporty with RWD, or the very least forced induction. Why can't it run alongside of the 350?

IMO, Nissan is pulling a Toyota (*cough*bitch*cough*) move. They have no more fun cars. If you look at my list, there are 9 "sports" cars there, all within the same generation (bare in mind, there were variations). I can count on one hand....actually one finger how many sports cars Nissan has now. One. The 350. Thats it. No more turbo. No high revving engines. All FWD crap.

My opinion, take it or leave it. Nissan has made many fucked up moves, and will probably continue to do so.

Fuck, the least they could do is make an SE-R version with Brembo brakes and a super or turbo charger running 5psi. A fool can dream....
Rumour has it that there will be a SER model within the next few years, 350z is coming with a twin turbo set up after the GTR is released, which will have 3 trim levels the 400hp 450hp and the 530hp, not sure if this is true but doing alot of business for Waterloo Nissan talking to the big wigs @ head office this is what they tell me so who knows.


------------------
www.authoritymotorsport.com
Home to one of Canada's fastest all motor sport compact
89 CRX SI- LS/VTEC TURBO
94 GMC 2500 6.5L TURBO DIESEl
1994 TOYOTA SUPRA TURBO 6SPD
AUTHORITY 1 is offline   Reply With Quote