![]() |
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
VM Moderator
Posts: 12,178
Location: Guelph
Join Date: Nov 2003
Ride: 91 VW GTI
Fav Mod: Azenis RT615's Class: Street |
Quote:
------------------ Roses are #FF0000 Violets are #0000FF All my base are belong to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Captain Credit!
Posts: 2,131
Location: Under the hood of something
Join Date: Dec 2003
Ride: Gravel
Fav Mod: Boost Class: Off Road |
What output did the rest of your pulls yield?
And get Nick or someone to post up a compresson map for your stock turbo. I don't have one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 1,782
Join Date: Apr 2005
Ride: 1960 Citroen DS
Fav Mod: Class: Strip |
210 whp is easily doable with the right mods.
220 whp is doable on 100 octane and an open dump with optimized software. 220+ isn't going to happen on the baby K03S unless you're running nitrous. Excellent pull, but it does seem to be a slightly happy dyno. If you ran on a dynojet you'd probably put down 210-ish which is still fantastic for the stock turbo. Congrats! |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
VM Member
Posts: 1,782
Join Date: Apr 2005
Ride: 1960 Citroen DS
Fav Mod: Class: Strip |
Quote:
The closest map is the K04-01 which is just slightly more efficient. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 3,595
Location: London
Join Date: Aug 2004
Ride: 2002 VW Jetta
Fav Mod: stereo Class: |
Ya i am more then happy with anything over 200whp. i didn;t think i would get close to that even when i went there that day.
------------------ "So many mods they should call you Ned Flanders" 95 GSR 92 Festiva |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 3,154
Location: Kitchener
Join Date: Jul 2004
Ride: 2002 Subaru WRX
Fav Mod: TurboXS UTEC Class: Street |
I found this, but you gotta do flow conversions
![]() ------------------ 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX TurboXS Utec Full Turbo Back Exhaust Headers AEM CAI STi Goodies |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 134
Join Date: Mar 2006
Ride: 2004 Dodge SRT4
Fav Mod: Class: |
hey guys, it was my srt4.
The dyno was definately a little flattering. I'd say i was more around 250- 260 whp, and about 300 to 310 wtq. but whatever it is a dyno. It's all about which type of dyno you consider to measure power "correctly". |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
VM Member
Posts: 125
Join Date: Feb 2006
Ride:
Fav Mod: Class: |
Quote:
![]() Also I know the quattro eats a bit of hp from the a4s running the k04 but still the difference is maybe 1-6 whp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 3,595
Location: London
Join Date: Aug 2004
Ride: 2002 VW Jetta
Fav Mod: stereo Class: |
AWD has HUGE drivetrain loss also. like i said, i am probably closer to 200whp but the tq is about right.
my mods are all listed...i have the same mods as your A4 mentioned and i have the k03sport turbo which has a k04 exhaust side. i guess you aren't familiar with FWD 1.8T's, i don't see why you are so worked up over this. FMIC 2.5" downpipe intake apr 93 forge dv ------------------ "So many mods they should call you Ned Flanders" 95 GSR 92 Festiva |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 134
Join Date: Mar 2006
Ride: 2004 Dodge SRT4
Fav Mod: Class: |
again. lets state the obvious:
this was not a mustang dyno. this WAS a dynocom. there is the descrepancy nobody is lying. different dynos typically give more favorable numbers. end of story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
|
VM Moderator
Posts: 12,178
Location: Guelph
Join Date: Nov 2003
Ride: 91 VW GTI
Fav Mod: Azenis RT615's Class: Street |
Quote:
------------------ Roses are #FF0000 Violets are #0000FF All my base are belong to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
VM Member
Posts: 134
Join Date: Mar 2006
Ride: 2004 Dodge SRT4
Fav Mod: Class: |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 107
Location: KW
Join Date: Apr 2006
Ride: 1990 Integra RS
Fav Mod: Stage 1 Clutch Class: Street |
Some of you guys are such dyno queens, the point of the dyno is to show you where you make power and how well tuned your car is ( powerband ). There's always going to be discrepancies between one dyno to another, even if you dyno your car on the same dyno again, it'll show difference in hp. The point to it is that you have a baseline of your car's power so you can compare next time you tune it or upgrade something etc.
Once again, its not "all" about HP.. Later. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
VM Member
Posts: 3,595
Location: London
Join Date: Aug 2004
Ride: 2002 VW Jetta
Fav Mod: stereo Class: |
^^^ you're right, and i plan on getting a bigger cat-back and a turbo inlet pipe so i want to see the difference. there is no real tuning in our cars. sure you can tweak the timing a little bit but not too much. so in this case it's about baselines and straight up power!
------------------ "So many mods they should call you Ned Flanders" 95 GSR 92 Festiva |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
VM Member
Posts: 838
Location: Kitchener-Waterloo
Join Date: Mar 2005
Ride: 2001, Nissan Sentra
Fav Mod: sr20det Class: Street |
Quote:
Both of you seem to be making respectable numbers and good work on that! You guys can battle the arguements about different dyno's until we all turn blue in the face, but that won't change the fact that they all perform differently. ------------------ 2001' Nissan Sentra sr20det GTiR SAISAN TUNED... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|